Skulls Reopen an Ancient Mystery Surrounding the Death of Early Egyptian Kings

Listen to the article, the audio text is automatically generated by a machine system.

The departure of the king in ancient Egypt was likely not just the end of his life, but perhaps it also marked the end of the lives of some who served him.

A study of skulls of individuals buried near royal funerary tombs in Abydos has brought this possibility back to the forefront. The injuries revealed support the hypothesis that some members of the court were killed to accompany their rulers in the afterlife.

The results provide new evidence for a debate that has lasted more than a century regarding the sacrifice of servants upon the death of early Egyptian kings, but they do not conclude that all those buried around their rulers faced the same fate, nor do they alone reveal the circumstances of their deaths.

In detail, Dr. Roslyn Campbell, a researcher at Purdue University, re-examined 46 skulls preserved at the University of Cambridge, which were extracted from graves surrounding the funerary structures of Kings Ger and Jet and Queen Meret-Neith. She observed injuries in 18 of them that occurred close to the time of death, which may have been fatal.

These tombs date back to the First Dynasty, around five thousand years ago, and are associated with the royal funerary scene in the "Um al-Qa'ab" area of Abydos. It is believed that their owners were connected to the court, including ladies, seal bearers, inspectors, and artisans.

While King Aha was associated with a limited number of affiliated tombs, hundreds of graves surrounded the tombs of some of his successors and their funerary establishments, raising a question that remains unanswered: How did these individuals meet their end?

When the English Egyptologist Flinders Petrie excavated these tombs in the 1920s, he suggested that their owners were offered as human sacrifices.

However, he did not record evidence of violent injuries, raising the possibility that they were buried alive, while others proposed that they died naturally and were reburied upon the death of the ruler.

Modern examination revealed fractures and injuries, including a cut wound in the eye area. Campbell suggests that Petrie may have noticed some fractures, but considered them damage that occurred to the bones post-mortem, and did not recognize signs of their occurrence close to the time of death.

The researcher suggested that the injuries may have resulted from blows with flat and wide objects made of wood or animal horns, rather than the likelihood of using the war scepter known in ancient Egyptian art.

Campbell also emphasized that the sample is small and does not necessarily represent all the buried individuals. Additionally, the absence of injuries on some skulls does not allow for determining the cause of death of their owners or concluding that they were offered as sacrifices.

Salima Ikram, a professor at the American University in Cairo, considered that the importance of the study lies in using modern and rigorous methodologies to examine an old hypothesis. She pointed out the short lifespan of this practice and the replacement of humans with small statues.

Some members of the entourage may have seen accompanying the king as a promise of eternal service, while others faced their fate with fear or resistance. Egyptologist Dawn McCormack confirmed that the possibility of their sacrifice does not mean they accepted it willingly; the bones bear signs of violence, but they do not preserve the voices of their owners.